|
BUSH THE BLENDER
by H. Millard ©
2004 - Posted November 15, 2004
Can't get a handle on why President Bush is leaving our borders
open and why he wants to legalize millions of illegal aliens
and why he's allowing in more and more people from all over the
Third World? Here's a just-right-porridge theory on this. Maybe
you'll think this has some merit. Maybe you won't. See what
you think.
Before proceeding, however, we need to understand that the massive
immigration, legal and otherwise, that we see happening in America
is also happening world wide and we need to fearlessly say the
truth: what is going on is that the non-white Third World is
invading the white First World--often euphemistically called
the Western World. This is happening partly because the First
World is less populated than the Third World and has a low birth
rate. In other words, the First World is creating unfilled societal
niches and a vacuum that are being filled by others who find
First World nations more desirable than their own nations. Think:
"nature abhors a vacuum," but in human terms.
It is also a simple fact of existence that all living things
tend to gravitate to where they are more comfortable, and the
white First World is more comfortable than the non-white Third
World. In addition, living things, no less than electricity or
water, also seek the path of least resistance. Immigrants will
continue flowing into the First World nations so long as these
First World nations remain more comfortable than the Third World
nations and so long as these First World nations present only
minor resistance to the immigration. If the First World nations
become more uncomfortable and if the resistance is increased,
then the trend will slow down and reverse.
The invasion is being facilitated by our modern mass transportation
and is being enabled by white people who have been conditioned
and brow beaten into a collective aracial state of mind where
they believe, or are forced to pretend they believe, that race
doesn't exist and that all people are fungible. Replace this
white person in Holland or Denmark or France or Germany or the
U.S. or any other traditionally white nation with this non-white
person, and those caught up in aracial race-doesn't-exist thinking
won't say anything. And, if they do say something, it'll usually
be couched in PC terms about these others not assimilating. In
other words, it's okay, to hear some people tell it, if these
nations become non-white so long as the others become darker
versions of the people already there. Thus, to those who think
this way, the others are okay in, say, Germany, so long as these
others wear lederhosen and speak German. Somehow, that's supposed
to make them German and okay.
If we really want to be honest, we have to admit that we can't
intelligently discuss the present immigration situation unless
we also discuss race and ethnicity. The reality of the human
condition is that genes matter as much with us as they do with
birds or ants or plants or any other living things. People build
their societies in certain ways depending on their genes as surely
as birds build certain types of nests depending on their genes.
The so-called Western World is the way it is because of the dominant
genes that built it. And, the rest of the world is the way it
is because of the dominant genes that built it also. Maybe we
humans are too close to ourselves to see this or maybe we're
just too arrogant and give so-called free will too much credit
for our actions. If we could see us as we can see ants, we'd
realize that this type of human ant builds this type of ant hill
and this other one builds this other type.
With the above as background, say you believe that the cause
of most human conflicts is the result of what you think are not
real, but just "perceived" differences between races,
religions and nations.
Say you further believe that the way to avoid conflicts is to
eliminate perceived differences between races, religions and
nations.
Say you're President George W. Bush or any of a number of other
leaders with similar views. I call people with these views: Blenders.
In their purest, most radical form, Blenders want to blend away
all human differences in favor of a one size fits all plain wrap
human type.
|
||||||
|
click on links above to order. (Not A Paid Ad) |
What would you do, if you were a powerful Blender, to try to make our world a peaceful place of milk and honey (at least in your mind)? You would try to blend away differences--remove the extremes of differences--and end up with a conformist average. You would try to eliminate the too hot and the too cold porridge and end up, like Goldilocks, with the just right porridge in the middle.
To stop racial conflicts, you might try to have people all blend together genetically. But, how do you do that in a so-called free society? First, you might "educate" the public to believe that there are no racial differences worth spit. You might also enact laws promoting integration. Then, you'll always deny that any differences exist. You might even go so far as to run people out of town on a rail if they indicate there are racial differences. Remember Jimmy the Greek? Poor Jimmy was praising black athletes, but he got fired because his praise indicated that blacks have different musculature than whites. A physician in France received similar treatment when he started lowering the black infant mortality rate by delivering black babies earlier than he would deliver white babies. His theory is that blacks have a slightly shorter gestation period than whites. Now there's a controversy over a new heart medicine that doesn't seem to work very well in whites, but saves black lives. Darn racist pill. There are those who are trying to hide the fact that this black heart pill works on blacks and not on whites. Such racially specific medicine just gives evidence to the notion that people aren't just different because of different skin colors but that they are different from the blueprint on up. To understand that there are such differences starts a whole cascade of ideas that the Blenders don't want to happen.
Anyway, your goal if you are a Blender, remember, is to convince everyone that there are no real racial differences. The second thing you might do is to look at the racial demographics of your nation. Is it too white? Let in more blacks, browns and yellows. Is it too black? Allow in whites, browns and yellows. Then, try to keep the various races from finding their identity in their race, and constantly throw them together in all sorts of social situations so that the mating instinct will take over and they'll tend to meet and mate. Work as though you're mixing paint to help arrive at a blended color, and adjust the percentages of different peoples you allow in to get the color you want. Soon, most people will carry genes from all racial groups and will find it difficult to identify with any race. Your hope is that this will help end racial conflicts. Since you don't believe that people are different, it doesn't matter that your children or grandchildren don't look like you. This brown one is the same as this black one or this white one or this yellow one.
What about religious conflicts? Same principle. To accomplish religious blending, you would encourage ecumenism and outreach efforts by different religions to "understand" each other. In fact, what you really want to happen is for those who are meeting and talking to abandon those parts of their religions that may conflict with other religions. As a Blender you probably don't mind that our various religions carry different names so long as their rough edges are filed down so that all religions are "tolerant" and accepting of other religious views. And, what about those religious believers in whatever religion who really do believe that God is in charge, not humans, and that they must obey God even if what they think He wants isn't PC? As a Blender, you will try to discredit these people as fanatics so that others will avoid them and accept your mild, middle of the bell curve beliefs.
What about national conflicts? Promote globalism, which is just Blending in the area of economics and social structures.
If you have trouble understanding why Bush is motivated to
have the U.S. have open borders, ask yourself if the above, or
some variation of the above, might explain his words and actions.
If you still don't get it, take a look at the next George Bush
on the scene--George P. Bush, of Florida--who is half Mexican.
The Bush family is blending itself.
I know the views contained in this column aren't ones shared
by all who are concerned about illegal immigration, and I know
that it is de rigueur to try to run away from race and ethnicity
by saying things such as "We don't mind legal immigration,
we just don't want illegal immigration." However, if this
is the case, then why are so many people upset that Bush wants
to legalize all illegal aliens? If they're made legal, would
that make them okay with those who focus on legal versus illegal?
Unless we understand the world wide dynamic of what's going on
with the movement of populations and related issues, we'll never
be able to solve our problems and the United States will fall
to Third World levels.
The above can be summed up this way: Behind many of the troubling
things we see going on in the world today is a philosophy of
Blending, even though few people call it that.
